Re: Make set_handle_irq and handle_arch_irq generic, v3

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 02:20:12 PST (-0800), tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > This looks sensible. We have two options for getting this merged:
> > 
> > 1)   I'll take the whole lot through tip/irq/core
> > 
> > 2)   I'll apply patch 1/N to a special branch in tip. That branch will
> > contain
> >      only this commit on top of 4.16-rc4 and can be pulled by the relevant
> >      architecture maintainers, so they can apply their architecture specific
> >      patches.
> 
> Option 1 seems like the lowest overhead, as that way we don't need to sequence
> the patches between multiple trees.  If all the other arch maintianers are OK
> with it then that works for me.

Ok, I wait for someone to yell NO until tuesday. If that doesn't happen I
pick it up.

> The 0-day robot found a new build warning on openrisc.  I was plannning
> on submitting a v4 with this fix in it
>
>    diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
>    index d9eee0a2b7b4..eb612b1865d2 100644
>    --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
>    +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
>    @@ -24,6 +24,4 @@
>        #define NO_IRQ         (-1)
>       -extern void set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *));
>    -
>     #endif /* __ASM_OPENRISC_IRQ_H__ */
> 
> I can submit a v4, or you can just grab it from

Just reply on the v3 openrisc patch with a v4 and I grab it from there.

Thanks,

	tglx