Re: Make set_handle_irq and handle_arch_irq generic, v3

[Palmer Dabbelt]

On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 15:00:56 PST (-0800), tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > On Fri, 09 Mar 2018 02:20:12 PST (-0800), tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > > This looks sensible. We have two options for getting this merged:
> > >
> > > 1)   I'll take the whole lot through tip/irq/core
> > >
> > > 2)   I'll apply patch 1/N to a special branch in tip. That branch will
> > > contain
> > >      only this commit on top of 4.16-rc4 and can be pulled by the relevant
> > >      architecture maintainers, so they can apply their architecture specific
> > >      patches.
> >
> > Option 1 seems like the lowest overhead, as that way we don't need to sequence
> > the patches between multiple trees.  If all the other arch maintianers are OK
> > with it then that works for me.
>
> Ok, I wait for someone to yell NO until tuesday. If that doesn't happen I
> pick it up.
>
> > The 0-day robot found a new build warning on openrisc.  I was plannning
> > on submitting a v4 with this fix in it
> >
> >    diff --git a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> > b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> >    index d9eee0a2b7b4..eb612b1865d2 100644
> >    --- a/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> >    +++ b/arch/openrisc/include/asm/irq.h
> >    @@ -24,6 +24,4 @@
> >        #define NO_IRQ         (-1)
> >       -extern void set_handle_irq(void (*handle_irq)(struct pt_regs *));
> >    -
> >     #endif /* __ASM_OPENRISC_IRQ_H__ */
> >
> > I can submit a v4, or you can just grab it from
>
> Just reply on the v3 openrisc patch with a v4 and I grab it from there.

OK, I just did -- sorry it took a while, I had to prepare for the ELC
hackathon.