Re: [PATCH] genirq: Pass desc to __irq_free instead of irq number

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:52:02AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > Given that irq_to_desc() is a radix_tree_lookup and the reverse
> > operation is only a pointer dereference and that all callers of
> > __free_irq already have the desc, pass the desc instead of the irq
> > number.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> > 
> > this is a micro optimisation I noticed while looking at the irq code.
> 
> This made it into next as 83ac4ca943affce56a2c408ddb2f5232f478fb11 and
> ba63053f018721a0ad60b083e21a15e324a4a8c4. Is it right that it is there
> twice?

No. It's only one instance.

> And in the Author line the - in my name is missing. Would be great if
> that could be fixed up.

Sorry, I'm surely not rebasing that branch just to add a missing dash.

Thanks,

	tglx