Re: [RFC 06/10] thermal: samsung: Remove support for Exynos5440

[Chanwoo Choi]

Hi Krzysztof,

On 2018ë 04ì 25ì 05:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> The Exynos5440 is not actively developed, there are no development
> boards available and probably there are no real products with it.
> Remove wide-tree support for Exynos5440.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt |  14 +-
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c               | 155 +--------------------
>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h               |   1 -
>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)


After applied this patch, I tested the build and found out
'exynos5440' keyword. There is one comment including 'exynos5440' as following:

diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
index f92f470bce21..cb525228cfe1 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
@@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct exynos_tmu_data *data)
         * Exynos3250, Exynos4412, Exynos5250 and Exynos5260 incorrectly
         * states that INTCLEAR register has a different placing of bits
         * responsible for FALL IRQs than INTSTAT register.  Exynos5420
-        * and Exynos5440 documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
+        * documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
         * support FALL IRQs at all).
         */
        writel(val_irq, data->base + tmu_intclear);

After removing it, looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>

-- 
Best Regards,
Chanwoo Choi
Samsung Electronics