Re: [RFC 06/10] thermal: samsung: Remove support for Exynos5440

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 3:41 AM, Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On 2018ë 04ì 25ì 05:32, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The Exynos5440 is not actively developed, there are no development
>> boards available and probably there are no real products with it.
>> Remove wide-tree support for Exynos5440.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/thermal/exynos-thermal.txt |  14 +-
>>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c               | 155 +--------------------
>>  drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.h               |   1 -
>>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 166 deletions(-)
>
>
> After applied this patch, I tested the build and found out
> 'exynos5440' keyword. There is one comment including 'exynos5440' as following:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> index f92f470bce21..cb525228cfe1 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/samsung/exynos_tmu.c
> @@ -943,7 +943,7 @@ static void exynos4210_tmu_clear_irqs(struct exynos_tmu_data *data)
>          * Exynos3250, Exynos4412, Exynos5250 and Exynos5260 incorrectly
>          * states that INTCLEAR register has a different placing of bits
>          * responsible for FALL IRQs than INTSTAT register.  Exynos5420
> -        * and Exynos5440 documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
> +        * documentation is correct (Exynos4210 doesn't
>          * support FALL IRQs at all).
>          */
>         writel(val_irq, data->base + tmu_intclear);
>
> After removing it, looks good to me.
> Reviewed-by: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Thanks, I left this comment intentionally as it has some meaning even
when Exynos5440 is not supported.

Best regards,
Krzysztof