Re: [PATCH] Documentation: refcount-vs-atomic: Update reference to LKMM doc.

[Kees Cook]

On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Andrea Parri
<andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> The LKMM project has moved to 'tools/memory-model/'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <andrea.parri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> index 83351c258cdb9..322851bada167 100644
> --- a/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ in order to help maintainers validate their code against the change in
>  these memory ordering guarantees.
>
>  The terms used through this document try to follow the formal LKMM defined in
> -github.com/aparri/memory-model/blob/master/Documentation/explanation.txt
> +tools/memory-model/Documentation/explanation.txt.
>
>  memory-barriers.txt and atomic_t.txt provide more background to the
>  memory ordering in general and for atomic operations specifically.

Will this get linkified by rst ?

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security