Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] pcal6524 extensions and fixes for pca953x driver

[H. Nikolaus Schaller]

> Am 16.05.2018 um 16:31 schrieb Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Am 16.05.2018 um 13:53 schrieb Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 6:31 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> V5:
>>>> * fix wrong split up between patches 1/7and 2/7.
>>> 
>>> I applied patches 1, 2, 3 so we get some movement on the patch
>>> set and not too much for you to rebase.
>> 
>> thanks!
>> 
>> Well, I already had edited the commit messages for resending...
>> 
>>> 
>>> It's fine to just resend the rest next time.
>> 
>> There is only one point open before resending:
>> 
>> what is the preferred style to be used for PCAL_GPIO_MASK?
>> 
>> * GENMASK(4, 0)
>> * or 0x1f
> 
> No strong opinion... sorry. Whatever you & the other driver
> contributors are most convenient with.

Ok, then let's keep the GENMASK(4, 0) since nobody did complain
about it.

BR and thanks,
Nikolaus