Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] pcal6524 extensions and fixes for pca953x driver

[Linus Walleij]

On Wed, May 16, 2018 at 3:32 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Am 16.05.2018 um 13:53 schrieb Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>> On Sat, Apr 28, 2018 at 6:31 PM, H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> V5:
>>> * fix wrong split up between patches 1/7and 2/7.
>>
>> I applied patches 1, 2, 3 so we get some movement on the patch
>> set and not too much for you to rebase.
>
> thanks!
>
> Well, I already had edited the commit messages for resending...
>
>>
>> It's fine to just resend the rest next time.
>
> There is only one point open before resending:
>
> what is the preferred style to be used for PCAL_GPIO_MASK?
>
> * GENMASK(4, 0)
> * or 0x1f

No strong opinion... sorry. Whatever you & the other driver
contributors are most convenient with.

Yours,
Linus Walleij