Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] dt-bindings: Documentation for qcom, llcc

[rishabhb]

On 2018-05-16 11:08, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting rishabhb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2018-05-16 10:33:14)
> > On 2018-05-16 10:03, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Rishabh Bhatnagar (2018-05-08 13:22:00)
> >
> > >> +
> > >> +- max-slices:
> > >> +       usage: required
> > >> +       Value Type: <u32>
> > >> +       Definition: Number of cache slices supported by hardware
> > >> +
> > >> +Example:
> > >> +
> > >> +       llcc: qcom,llcc@1100000 {
> > >
> > > cache-controller@1100000 ?
> > >
> > We have tried to use consistent naming convention as in llcc_*
> > everywhere.
> > Using cache-controller will mix and match the naming convention. Also 
> > in
> > the documentation it is explained what llcc is and its full form.
>
> DT prefers standard node names as opposed to vendor specific node 
> names.
> Isn't it a cache controller? I fail to see why this can't be done.
Hi Stephen,
The driver is vendor specific and also for uniformity purposes we 
preferred
to go with this name.