Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc: synopsys dwc mshc support
From: Prabu Thangamuthu
Date: Mon May 28 2018 - 08:12:15 EST
Hi Adrian,
On 5/24/2018 5:43 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 24/05/18 14:28, Prabu Thangamuthu wrote:
>> Hi Adrian,
>>
>> On 5/24/2018 2:06 PM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> This patch is mangled.
>> We will check it.
>>> On 22/05/18 09:42, Prabu Thangamuthu wrote:
>>>> To enable Synopsys DWC MSHC controller on HPAS-DX platform connected using
>>>> PCIe interface. As Clock generation logic is implemented in MMCM module of
>>>> HAPS-DX platform, we have separate functions to control the MMCM to
>>>> generate required clocks with respect to speed mode. Also we have platform
>>>> specific set_power function to support different VDD of eMMC devices.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Prabu Thangamuthu <prabu.t@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> ---
>>>> MAINTAINERS | 7 ++
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/Makefile | 3 +-
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c | 1 +
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc.c | 146
>>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc.h | 37 +++++++++
>>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci.h | 3 +
>>>> 6 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc.c
>>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc.h
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
>>>> index 9051a9c..f1749c4 100644
>>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS
>>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
>>>> @@ -12643,6 +12643,13 @@ S: Maintained
>>>> F: drivers/mmc/host/sdhci*
>>>> F: include/linux/mmc/sdhci*
>>>>
>>>> +SYNOPSYS SDHCI COMPLIANT DWC MSHC DRIVER
>>>> +M: Prabu Thangamuthu <prabu.t@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> +M: Manjunath M B <manjumb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> +L: linux-mmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> +S: Maintained
>>>> +F: drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc*
>>>> +
>>>> SECURE DIGITAL HOST CONTROLLER INTERFACE (SDHCI) SAMSUNG DRIVER
>>>> M: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> M: Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
>>>> index 6aead24..6c0d3fb 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Makefile
>>>> @@ -11,7 +11,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_MXC) += mxcmmc.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_MXS) += mxs-mmc.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI) += sdhci.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PCI) += sdhci-pci.o
>>>> -sdhci-pci-y += sdhci-pci-core.o sdhci-pci-o2micro.o
>>>> sdhci-pci-arasan.o
>>>> +sdhci-pci-y += sdhci-pci-core.o sdhci-pci-o2micro.o
>>>> sdhci-pci-arasan.o \
>>>> + sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc.o
>>>> obj-$(subst m,y,$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PCI)) += sdhci-pci-data.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_ACPI) += sdhci-acpi.o
>>>> obj-$(CONFIG_MMC_SDHCI_PXAV3) += sdhci-pxav3.o
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>>>> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>>>> index 77dd352..96b6963 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-core.c
>>>> @@ -1511,6 +1511,7 @@ static int amd_probe(struct sdhci_pci_chip *chip)
>>>> SDHCI_PCI_DEVICE(O2, SEABIRD0, o2),
>>>> SDHCI_PCI_DEVICE(O2, SEABIRD1, o2),
>>>> SDHCI_PCI_DEVICE(ARASAN, PHY_EMMC, arasan),
>>>> + SDHCI_PCI_DEVICE(SYNOPSYS, DWC_MSHC, snps),
>>>> SDHCI_PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(AMD, SYSTEM_SDHCI, PCI_CLASS_MASK, amd),
>>>> /* Generic SD host controller */
>>>> {PCI_DEVICE_CLASS(SYSTEM_SDHCI, PCI_CLASS_MASK)},
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc.c
>>>> b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc.c
>>>> new file mode 100644
>>>> index 0000000..bca3db4
>>>> --- /dev/null
>>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc.c
>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,146 @@
>>>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * SDHCI driver for Synopsys DWC_MSHC controller
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Copyright (C) 2018 Synopsys, Inc. (www.synopsys.com)
>>>> + *
>>>> + * Authors:
>>>> + * Prabu Thangamuthu <prabu.t@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> + * Manjunath M B <manjumb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> + *
>>>> + */
>>>> +
>>>> +#include <linux/pci.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>>>> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
>>>> +
>>>> +#include "sdhci.h"
>>>> +#include "sdhci-pci.h"
>>>> +#include "sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc.h"
>>>> +
>>>> +/* Default emmc vdd is set to 3.3V */
>>>> +static unsigned int emmc_vdd = SDHC_EMMC_VDD_330V;
>>>> +module_param(emmc_vdd, int, 0444);
>>> Why a module parameter?
>> Our platform has slots for eMMC devices which can supports both 1.8 V
>> and 3.3 V
>> operating modes. We want this module parameter to control the operating
>> voltage
>> of eMMC devices.
> So why not use firmware device properties?
We are assuming as you are referring EXT_CSD register of eMMC device to
understand 1.8V/3.3V support. But we need to fix the voltage before
enumeration of the eMMC device.
Please help us to understand more if you are not referring EXT_CSD register.
>
>>>> +
>>>> +static void sdhci_snps_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int
>>>> clock)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u16 clk = 0;
>>>> + u32 reg = 0;
>>>> + u32 vendor_ptr = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + vendor_ptr = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_VENDOR_PTR_R);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Disable Software managed rx tuning */
>>>> + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_AT_CTRL_R + vendor_ptr));
>>>> + reg &= ~SDHC_SW_TUNE_EN;
>>>> + sdhci_writel(host, reg, (SDHC_AT_CTRL_R + vendor_ptr));
>>>> +
>>>> + if (clock <= 52000000) {
>>>> + sdhci_set_clock(host, clock);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + /* Assert reset to MMCM */
>>>> + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
>>>> + reg |= SDHC_CCLK_MMCM_RST;
>>>> + sdhci_writel(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Configure MMCM*/
>>> Space between MMCM and *
>> Okay.
>>>> + sdhci_writel(host, DIV_REG_100_MHZ, SDHC_MMCM_DIV_REG);
>>>> + sdhci_writel(host, CLKFBOUT_100_MHZ,
>>>> + SDHC_MMCM_CLKFBOUT);
>>>> +
>>>> + /* De-assert reset to MMCM*/
>>> Space between MMCM and *
>> Okay.
>>>
>>>> + reg = sdhci_readl(host, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
>>>> + reg &= ~SDHC_CCLK_MMCM_RST;
>>>> + sdhci_writel(host, reg, (SDHC_GPIO_OUT + vendor_ptr));
>>>> +
>>>> + /* Enable clock */
>>>> + clk = SDHCI_PROG_CLOCK_MODE | SDHCI_CLOCK_INT_EN |
>>>> + SDHCI_CLOCK_CARD_EN;
>>>> + sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static void sdhci_snps_set_power(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned char
>>>> mode,
>>>> + unsigned short vdd)
>>>> +{
>>>> + u8 pwr = 0;
>>>> + u16 ctrl;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (mode != MMC_POWER_OFF) {
>>>> + switch (1 << vdd) {
>>>> + case MMC_VDD_165_195:
>>>> + pwr = SDHCI_POWER_180;
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case MMC_VDD_29_30:
>>>> + case MMC_VDD_30_31:
>>>> + pwr = SDHCI_POWER_300;
>>>> + break;
>>>> + case MMC_VDD_32_33:
>>>> + case MMC_VDD_33_34:
>>>> + pwr = SDHCI_POWER_330;
>>>> + break;
>>>> + default:
>>>> + WARN(1, "%s: Invalid vdd %#x\n",
>>>> + mmc_hostname(host->mmc), vdd);
>>>> + break;
>>>> + }
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>> + if (host->pwr == pwr)
>>>> + return;
>>>> +
>>>> + host->pwr = pwr;
>>>> +
>>>> + if (pwr == 0) {
>>>> + sdhci_writeb(host, 0, SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL);
>>>> + } else {
>>>> + sdhci_writeb(host, 0, SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL);
>>>> +
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Enable it for eMMC phy cfg1 test with 1.8V mode
>>>> + */
>>>> + if (emmc_vdd == SDHC_EMMC_VDD_180V) {
>>>> + pwr = SDHCI_POWER_180;
>>>> + sdhci_writeb(host, pwr, SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL);
>>>> +
>>>> + ctrl = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>>>> + /*
>>>> + * Enable 1.8V Signal Enable in the Host Control2
>>>> + * register
>>>> + */
>>>> + ctrl |= SDHCI_CTRL_VDD_180;
>>>> + sdhci_writew(host, ctrl, SDHCI_HOST_CONTROL2);
>>>> + }
>>>> + pwr |= SDHCI_POWER_ON;
>>>> +
>>>> + sdhci_writeb(host, pwr, SDHCI_POWER_CONTROL);
>>>> + }
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +static int sdhci_snps_pci_probe_slot(struct sdhci_pci_slot *slot)
>>>> +{
>>>> + struct sdhci_host *host = slot->host;
>>>> +
>>>> + host->caps = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES);
>>>> + host->caps1 = sdhci_readl(host, SDHCI_CAPABILITIES_1);
>>> Why read caps here?
>> We had it for logging purpose. we will remove it.
> To prevent 3.0V or 3.3V clear the corresponding capabilities bits. There
> are DT bindings for overriding the capabilities.
>
> To use only 1.8V signaling clear SDHCI_SIGNALING_330 from host->flags.
>
> Then you shouldn't need sdhci_snps_set_power().
Agree your point. we will test with this approach and share the patches.
Thanks,
Prabu