Re: [PATCH 1/1] mmc: sdhci-pci-dwc-mshc: synopsys dwc mshc support
From: Andy Shevchenko
Date: Mon May 28 2018 - 08:19:33 EST
On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 9:42 AM, Prabu Thangamuthu <Prabu.T@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To enable Synopsys DWC MSHC controller on HPAS-DX platform connected using
> PCIe interface. As Clock generation logic is implemented in MMCM module of
> HAPS-DX platform, we have separate functions to control the MMCM to
> generate required clocks with respect to speed mode. Also we have platform
> specific set_power function to support different VDD of eMMC devices.
> + * Authors:
> + * Prabu Thangamuthu <prabu.t@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + * Manjunath M B <manjumb@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> + *
Redundant last line in above excerpt.
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
This one is effectively included by module.h.
> +/* Default emmc vdd is set to 3.3V */
> +static unsigned int emmc_vdd = SDHC_EMMC_VDD_330V;
> +module_param(emmc_vdd, int, 0444);
This looks weird. Why do you need a module parameter?
> + u16 clk = 0;
> + u32 reg = 0;
> + u32 vendor_ptr = 0;
Why do above have assignments?
> +MODULE_PARM_DESC(emmc_vdd, "VDD to configure eMMC device supply voltage");
This better to be near to the parameter declaration. Though, as I said
above, it feels wrong to have it in the first place.
> +/* Synopsys Vendor Specific Registers */
> +#define SDHC_GPIO_OUT 0x34
> +#define SDHC_AT_CTRL_R 0x40
> +
> +#define SDHC_SW_TUNE_EN 0x00000010
> +
> +/* MMCM DRP */
> +#define SDHC_MMCM_DIV_REG 0x1020
> +#define DIV_REG_100_MHZ 0x1145
> +
> +#define SDHC_MMCM_CLKFBOUT 0x1024
> +#define CLKFBOUT_100_MHZ 0x0000
> +
> +#define SDHC_CCLK_MMCM_RST 0x00000001
Do you need these all in the header file? Why?
> +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_SYNOPSYS_DWC_MSHC 0xC202
Absent blank line.
Broken style of the value.
Who knows what else wrong with this patch? Please, pay attention to
the details and check twice before submit.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko