Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/24] 4.4.137-stable review

[Rafael Tinoco]

Results from Linaroâs test farm.
Regressions detected.

NOTE:

1) LTP vma03 test (cve-2011-2496) broken on v4.4-137-rc1 because of:

     6ea1dc96a03a mmap: relax file size limit for regular files
     bd2f9ce5bacb mmap: introduce sane default mmap limits

   discussion:

     https://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp/issues/341

   mainline commit (v4.13-rc7):

     0cc3b0ec23ce Clarify (and fix) MAX_LFS_FILESIZE macros

   should be backported to 4.4.138-rc2 and fixes the issue.

2) select04 failure on x15 board will be investigated in:

     https://bugs.linaro.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3852

   and seems to be a timing issue (HW related).

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.4.137-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-4.4.y
git commit: 678437d36d4e14a029309f1c282802ce47fda36a
git describe: v4.4.136-25-g678437d36d4e
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/v4.4.136-25-g678437d36d4e

Regressions (compared to build v4.4.136)
------------------------------------------------------------------------

qemu_arm:
  ltp-cve-tests:
    * cve-2011-2496
    * runltp_cve

    * test src: git://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git

x15 - arm:
  ltp-cve-tests:
    * cve-2011-2496
    * runltp_cve

    * test src: git://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git
  ltp-syscalls-tests:
    * runltp_syscalls
    * select04

    * test src: git://github.com/linux-test-project/ltp.git

Ran 7100 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- juno-r2 - arm64
- qemu_arm
- qemu_x86_64
- x15 - arm
- x86_64

Test Suites
-----------
* boot
* kselftest
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-timers-tests
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 4.4.137-rc1
git repo: https://git.linaro.org/lkft/arm64-stable-rc.git
git branch: 4.4.137-rc1-hikey-20180612-214
git commit: e5d5cb57472f9f98a68f872664de3d70610019e1
git describe: 4.4.137-rc1-hikey-20180612-214
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linaro-hikey-stable-rc-4.4-oe/build/4.4.137-rc1-hikey-20180612-214

No regressions (compared to build 4.4.136-rc2-hikey-20180606-212)

Ran 2611 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- hi6220-hikey - arm64
- qemu_arm64

Test Suites
-----------
* boot
* kselftest
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-timers-tests
* ltp-fs-tests

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

On 12 June 2018 at 13:51, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.4.137 release.
> There are 24 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu Jun 14 16:48:07 UTC 2018.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/stable-review/patch-4.4.137-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-4.4.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h