Hi Alex
On 06/26/2018 10:44 AM, Alexandre Torgue wrote:
Hi AmÃlie
On 05/17/2018 04:21 PM, Amelie Delaunay wrote:
Enable the STM32 SPI driver, implemented on STM32MP1 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx>
---
 arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
index 89167cd..f990335 100644
--- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
+++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig
@@ -411,6 +411,7 @@ CONFIG_SPI_S3C64XX=m
 CONFIG_SPI_SH_MSIOF=m
 CONFIG_SPI_SH_HSPI=y
 CONFIG_SPI_SIRF=y
+CONFIG_SPI_STM32=y
 CONFIG_SPI_SUN4I=y
 CONFIG_SPI_SUN6I=y
 CONFIG_SPI_TEGRA114=y
Driver which are are not "vital" to boot STM32 platform should be defined as module. It's the case for this one. Isn't ?
You're right. I'll send v2 with CONFIG_SPI_STM32=m ASAP. Should I resend
the whole patchset (with DT), or just this patch and you take the DT
patches as they are ?
Regards,
Amelie