Re: cpu_no_speculation omissions?

[Dave Hansen]

On 07/16/2018 09:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rich Felker wrote:
>> At least the Centerton (late-generation Bonnell uarch) Atom family is
>> omitted from the cpu_no_speculation table added by commit fec9434a12f3
>> to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c. Is this intentional? Would a patch
>> adding it and possibly other omissions be welcome?
> 
> Probably. Dave?

IIRC, Alan Cox was compiling a list on what is affected vs. not.  He
would know way better than I.

Rich, did you have a specific set of family/model combinations that you
thought were missed?