Re: cpu_no_speculation omissions?

[Alan Cox]

On Mon, 2018-07-16 at 10:28 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 07/16/2018 09:56 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Rich Felker wrote:
> > > At least the Centerton (late-generation Bonnell uarch) Atom
> > > family is
> > > omitted from the cpu_no_speculation table added by commit
> > > fec9434a12f3
> > > to arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c. Is this intentional? Would a
> > > patch
> > > adding it and possibly other omissions be welcome?
> > 
> > Probably. Dave?
> 
> IIRC, Alan Cox was compiling a list on what is affected vs. not.  He
> would know way better than I.

The pre Silvermont atom cores are in order. When I did the original
list I didn't bother with all the 32bit cores as we didn't have any
32bit mitigations then.

Alan