Re: [PATCH v2] EDAC, sb_edac: Add support for systems with segmented PCI buses
From: Masayoshi Mizuma
Date: Wed Jul 25 2018 - 20:27:34 EST
Hi Boris,
On 07/25/2018 05:22 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:02:13PM -0400, Masayoshi Mizuma wrote:
>> [*] KASAN report is as follows.
>
> That KASAN report is an arbitrary side-effect from the missing segmented
> support so I ripped it out from the commit message and ended up
> committing this:
Thank you so much!
- Masa
>
> ---
> From: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2018 15:02:13 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] EDAC, sb_edac: Add support for systems with segmented PCI buses
>
> Extend the driver to check whether segment number and bus number matches
> when deciding how to group memory controller PCI devices to CPU sockets.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masayoshi Mizuma <m.mizuma@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180724190213.26359-1-msys.mizuma@xxxxxxxxx
> [ Cleanup commit message. ]
> Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/edac/sb_edac.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> index 4a89c8093307..07726fb00321 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
> @@ -352,6 +352,7 @@ struct pci_id_table {
>
> struct sbridge_dev {
> struct list_head list;
> + int seg;
> u8 bus, mc;
> u8 node_id, source_id;
> struct pci_dev **pdev;
> @@ -729,7 +730,8 @@ static inline int numcol(u32 mtr)
> return 1 << cols;
> }
>
> -static struct sbridge_dev *get_sbridge_dev(u8 bus, enum domain dom, int multi_bus,
> +static struct sbridge_dev *get_sbridge_dev(int seg, u8 bus, enum domain dom,
> + int multi_bus,
> struct sbridge_dev *prev)
> {
> struct sbridge_dev *sbridge_dev;
> @@ -747,14 +749,15 @@ static struct sbridge_dev *get_sbridge_dev(u8 bus, enum domain dom, int multi_bu
> : sbridge_edac_list.next, struct sbridge_dev, list);
>
> list_for_each_entry_from(sbridge_dev, &sbridge_edac_list, list) {
> - if (sbridge_dev->bus == bus && (dom == SOCK || dom == sbridge_dev->dom))
> + if ((sbridge_dev->seg == seg) && (sbridge_dev->bus == bus) &&
> + (dom == SOCK || dom == sbridge_dev->dom))
> return sbridge_dev;
> }
>
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static struct sbridge_dev *alloc_sbridge_dev(u8 bus, enum domain dom,
> +static struct sbridge_dev *alloc_sbridge_dev(int seg, u8 bus, enum domain dom,
> const struct pci_id_table *table)
> {
> struct sbridge_dev *sbridge_dev;
> @@ -771,6 +774,7 @@ static struct sbridge_dev *alloc_sbridge_dev(u8 bus, enum domain dom,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> + sbridge_dev->seg = seg;
> sbridge_dev->bus = bus;
> sbridge_dev->dom = dom;
> sbridge_dev->n_devs = table->n_devs_per_imc;
> @@ -2246,6 +2250,7 @@ static int sbridge_get_onedevice(struct pci_dev **prev,
> struct sbridge_dev *sbridge_dev = NULL;
> const struct pci_id_descr *dev_descr = &table->descr[devno];
> struct pci_dev *pdev = NULL;
> + int seg = 0;
> u8 bus = 0;
> int i = 0;
>
> @@ -2276,10 +2281,12 @@ static int sbridge_get_onedevice(struct pci_dev **prev,
> /* End of list, leave */
> return -ENODEV;
> }
> + seg = pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus);
> bus = pdev->bus->number;
>
> next_imc:
> - sbridge_dev = get_sbridge_dev(bus, dev_descr->dom, multi_bus, sbridge_dev);
> + sbridge_dev = get_sbridge_dev(seg, bus, dev_descr->dom,
> + multi_bus, sbridge_dev);
> if (!sbridge_dev) {
> /* If the HA1 wasn't found, don't create EDAC second memory controller */
> if (dev_descr->dom == IMC1 && devno != 1) {
> @@ -2292,7 +2299,7 @@ static int sbridge_get_onedevice(struct pci_dev **prev,
> if (dev_descr->dom == SOCK)
> goto out_imc;
>
> - sbridge_dev = alloc_sbridge_dev(bus, dev_descr->dom, table);
> + sbridge_dev = alloc_sbridge_dev(seg, bus, dev_descr->dom, table);
> if (!sbridge_dev) {
> pci_dev_put(pdev);
> return -ENOMEM;
>