Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: iproc: Add ACPI support to IPROC SDHCI

From: Srinath Mannam
Date: Fri Jul 27 2018 - 04:59:52 EST

Next message: Jia-Ju Bai: "[PATCH] sound: pci: cthw20k2: Replace mdelay() with msleep() and usleep_range()"
Previous message: Robin Gong: "RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] ARM: imx6q: provide documentation for new fsl,pmic-stby-poweroff property"
In reply to: Adrian Hunter: "Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: iproc: Add ACPI support to IPROC SDHCI"
Next in thread: Adrian Hunter: "Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: iproc: Add ACPI support to IPROC SDHCI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hi Adrian Hunter,

Thank you very much for review and feedback.
Please find my comments inline..

On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 11:50 AM, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 17/07/18 19:45, Srinath Mannam wrote:
>> Add ACPI support to all IPROC SDHCI varients
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinath Mannam <srinath.mannam@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Ray Jui <ray.jui@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Scott Branden <scott.branden@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Olovyannikov <vladimir.olovyannikov@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c | 187 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>> 2 files changed, 128 insertions(+), 60 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>> index 0581c19..bc6702e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/Kconfig
>> @@ -334,6 +334,7 @@ config MMC_SDHCI_IPROC
>> tristate "SDHCI support for the BCM2835 & iProc SD/MMC Controller"
>> depends on ARCH_BCM2835 || ARCH_BCM_IPROC || COMPILE_TEST
>> depends on MMC_SDHCI_PLTFM
>> + depends on OF || ACPI
>> default ARCH_BCM_IPROC
>> select MMC_SDHCI_IO_ACCESSORS
>> help
>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c
>> index d0e83db..7c5c923 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-iproc.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>> * iProc SDHCI platform driver
>> */
>>
>> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/module.h>
>> #include <linux/mmc/host.h>
>> @@ -162,9 +163,19 @@ static void sdhci_iproc_writeb(struct sdhci_host *host, u8 val, int reg)
>> sdhci_iproc_writel(host, newval, reg & ~3);
>> }
>>
>> +static unsigned int sdhci_iproc_get_max_clock(struct sdhci_host *host)
>> +{
>> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
>> +
>> + if (pltfm_host->clk)
>> + return sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock(host);
>> + else
>> + return pltfm_host->clock;
>> +}
>> +
>> static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_iproc_ops = {
>> .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
>> - .get_max_clock = sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock,
>> + .get_max_clock = sdhci_iproc_get_max_clock,
>> .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
>> .reset = sdhci_reset,
>> .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
>> @@ -178,34 +189,24 @@ static const struct sdhci_ops sdhci_iproc_32only_ops = {
>> .write_w = sdhci_iproc_writew,
>> .write_b = sdhci_iproc_writeb,
>> .set_clock = sdhci_set_clock,
>> - .get_max_clock = sdhci_pltfm_clk_get_max_clock,
>> + .get_max_clock = sdhci_iproc_get_max_clock,
>> .set_bus_width = sdhci_set_bus_width,
>> .reset = sdhci_reset,
>> .set_uhs_signaling = sdhci_set_uhs_signaling,
>> };
>>
>> +enum sdhci_pltfm_type {
>> + SDHCI_PLTFM_IPROC_CYGNUS,
>> + SDHCI_PLTFM_IPROC,
>> + SDHCI_PLTFM_BCM2835,
>> +};
>> +
>> static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_iproc_cygnus_pltfm_data = {
>> .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK,
>> .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_ACMD23_BROKEN | SDHCI_QUIRK2_HOST_OFF_CARD_ON,
>> .ops = &sdhci_iproc_32only_ops,
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct sdhci_iproc_data iproc_cygnus_data = {
>> - .pdata = &sdhci_iproc_cygnus_pltfm_data,
>> - .caps = ((0x1 << SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_SHIFT)
>> - & SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_MASK) |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330 |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_VDD_180 |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_DO_SUSPEND |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_DO_ADMA2 |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_DO_SDMA,
>> - .caps1 = SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_C |
>> - SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_D |
>> - SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50,
>> - .mmc_caps = MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR,
>> -};
>> -
>> static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_iproc_pltfm_data = {
>> .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK |
>> SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ_ACMD12,
>> @@ -213,21 +214,6 @@ static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_iproc_pltfm_data = {
>> .ops = &sdhci_iproc_ops,
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct sdhci_iproc_data iproc_data = {
>> - .pdata = &sdhci_iproc_pltfm_data,
>> - .caps = ((0x1 << SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_SHIFT)
>> - & SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_MASK) |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330 |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_VDD_180 |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_DO_SUSPEND |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_DO_ADMA2 |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_DO_SDMA,
>> - .caps1 = SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_C |
>> - SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_D |
>> - SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50,
>> -};
>> -
>> static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_bcm2835_pltfm_data = {
>> .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_CARD_DETECTION |
>> SDHCI_QUIRK_DATA_TIMEOUT_USES_SDCLK |
>> @@ -237,38 +223,104 @@ static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_bcm2835_pltfm_data = {
>> .ops = &sdhci_iproc_32only_ops,
>> };
>>
>> -static const struct sdhci_iproc_data bcm2835_data = {
>> - .pdata = &sdhci_bcm2835_pltfm_data,
>> - .caps = ((0x1 << SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_SHIFT)
>> - & SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_MASK) |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330 |
>> - SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD,
>> - .caps1 = SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_A |
>> - SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_C,
>> - .mmc_caps = 0x00000000,
>> +static const struct sdhci_iproc_data sdhci_iproc_data_list[] = {
>
> Why change to an array? Also would need to be a separate patch.
In the existing device tree support, data parameter of of_device_id
list contains pointers of "sdhci_iproc_data" structure.
But driver_data parameter in acpi_device_id list is ulong. so we can't
assign "sdhci_iproc_data" structure pointer which can be 64bit.
Hence, it is required to take array of "sdhci_iproc_data" structures,
so that array index can assign to both data and driver_data
parameters of of_device_id and acpi_device_id lists respectively. same
pattern found in some other drivers.
This method is required to use in the part of adding ACPI support. so
I keep in single patch.

>
>> + [SDHCI_PLTFM_IPROC_CYGNUS] = {
>> + /* SDHCI IPROC CYGNUS */
>> + .pdata = &sdhci_iproc_cygnus_pltfm_data,
>> + .caps = ((0x1 << SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_SHIFT)
>> + & SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_MASK) |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330 |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_VDD_180 |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_SUSPEND |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_ADMA2 |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_SDMA,
>> + .caps1 = SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_C |
>> + SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_D |
>> + SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50,
>> + .mmc_caps = MMC_CAP_1_8V_DDR,
>> + },
>> + [SDHCI_PLTFM_IPROC] = {
>> + /* SDHCI IPROC */
>> + .pdata = &sdhci_iproc_pltfm_data,
>> + .caps = ((0x1 << SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_SHIFT)
>> + & SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_MASK) |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330 |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_VDD_180 |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_SUSPEND |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_ADMA2 |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_SDMA,
>> + .caps1 = SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_C |
>> + SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_D |
>> + SDHCI_SUPPORT_DDR50,
>> + },
>> + [SDHCI_PLTFM_BCM2835] = {
>> + /* SDHCI BCM2835 */
>> + .pdata = &sdhci_bcm2835_pltfm_data,
>> + .caps = ((0x1 << SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_SHIFT)
>> + & SDHCI_MAX_BLOCK_MASK) |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_VDD_330 |
>> + SDHCI_CAN_DO_HISPD,
>> + .caps1 = SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_A |
>> + SDHCI_DRIVER_TYPE_C,
>> + .mmc_caps = 0x00000000,
>> +
>> + },
>> };
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id sdhci_iproc_of_match[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "brcm,bcm2835-sdhci", .data = &bcm2835_data },
>> - { .compatible = "brcm,sdhci-iproc-cygnus", .data = &iproc_cygnus_data},
>> - { .compatible = "brcm,sdhci-iproc", .data = &iproc_data },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "brcm,bcm2835-sdhci",
>> + .data = (void *)SDHCI_PLTFM_BCM2835
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "brcm,sdhci-iproc-cygnus",
>> + .data = (void *)SDHCI_PLTFM_IPROC_CYGNUS
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "brcm,sdhci-iproc",
>> + .data = (void *)SDHCI_PLTFM_IPROC
>> + },
>> { }
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sdhci_iproc_of_match);
>>
>> +static const struct acpi_device_id sdhci_iproc_acpi_ids[] = {
>> + { .id = "BRCM5871", .driver_data = SDHCI_PLTFM_IPROC_CYGNUS },
>> + { .id = "BRCM5872", .driver_data = SDHCI_PLTFM_IPROC },
>> + { /* sentinel */ }
>> +};
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, sdhci_iproc_acpi_ids);
>> +
>> static int sdhci_iproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>> const struct of_device_id *match;
>> + const struct acpi_device_id *acpi_id;
>> const struct sdhci_iproc_data *iproc_data;
>> struct sdhci_host *host;
>> struct sdhci_iproc_host *iproc_host;
>> struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host;
>> int ret;
>> + enum sdhci_pltfm_type plat_type;
>> +
>> + if (dev->of_node) {
>> + match = of_match_device(sdhci_iproc_of_match, dev);
>> + if (match)
>> + plat_type = (enum sdhci_pltfm_type)match->data;
>> + else
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + } else if (has_acpi_companion(dev)) {
>> + acpi_id = acpi_match_device(sdhci_iproc_acpi_ids, dev);
>> + if (acpi_id)
>> + plat_type = (enum sdhci_pltfm_type)acpi_id->driver_data;
>> + else
>> + return -ENODEV;
>> + } else
>> + return -ENODEV;
>>
>> - match = of_match_device(sdhci_iproc_of_match, &pdev->dev);
>> - if (!match)
>> - return -EINVAL;
>> - iproc_data = match->data;
>> + iproc_data = &sdhci_iproc_data_list[plat_type];
>>
>> host = sdhci_pltfm_init(pdev, iproc_data->pdata, sizeof(*iproc_host));
>> if (IS_ERR(host))
>> @@ -284,17 +336,30 @@ static int sdhci_iproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> host->mmc->caps |= iproc_host->data->mmc_caps;
>>
>> - pltfm_host->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> - if (IS_ERR(pltfm_host->clk)) {
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(pltfm_host->clk);
>> - goto err;
>> - }
>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(pltfm_host->clk);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable host clk\n");
>> - goto err;
>> + if (dev->of_node) {
>> + pltfm_host->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(pltfm_host->clk)) {
>> + ret = PTR_ERR(pltfm_host->clk);
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(pltfm_host->clk);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to enable host clk\n");
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> + } else if (has_acpi_companion(dev)) {
>> + /*
>> + * When Driver probe with ACPI device, clock devices
>> + * are not available, so sdhci clock get from
>> + * clock-frequency property given in _DSD object.
>> + */
>> + device_property_read_u32(dev, "clock-frequency",
>> + &pltfm_host->clock);
>
> Is this a new property, or is it documented? Did you consider enhancing
> __sdhci_read_caps() and using the existing "sdhci-caps" and
> "sdhci-caps-mask" properties?
>
"clock-frequency" is not a new property also used in "sdhci-pltfm.c"
to get clock
frequency and use in the case of clock device node is not passed from
device tree node.
But In the case of ACPI support, ACPI does not support common clock framework.
so clock frequency get by "clock-frequency" property given in _DSD
object of ACPI device node.

>> + if (!pltfm_host->clock) {
>> + ret = -ENODEV;
>> + goto err;
>> + }
>> }
>> -
>> if (iproc_host->data->pdata->quirks & SDHCI_QUIRK_MISSING_CAPS) {
>> host->caps = iproc_host->data->caps;
>> host->caps1 = iproc_host->data->caps1;
>> @@ -307,7 +372,8 @@ static int sdhci_iproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>>
>> err_clk:
>> - clk_disable_unprepare(pltfm_host->clk);
>> + if (dev->of_node)
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(pltfm_host->clk);
>> err:
>> sdhci_pltfm_free(pdev);
>> return ret;
>> @@ -317,6 +383,7 @@ static struct platform_driver sdhci_iproc_driver = {
>> .driver = {
>> .name = "sdhci-iproc",
>> .of_match_table = sdhci_iproc_of_match,
>> + .acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(sdhci_iproc_acpi_ids),
>> .pm = &sdhci_pltfm_pmops,
>> },
>> .probe = sdhci_iproc_probe,
>>
>
Regards,
Srinath.

Next message: Jia-Ju Bai: "[PATCH] sound: pci: cthw20k2: Replace mdelay() with msleep() and usleep_range()"
Previous message: Robin Gong: "RE: [PATCH v8 1/6] ARM: imx6q: provide documentation for new fsl,pmic-stby-poweroff property"
In reply to: Adrian Hunter: "Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: iproc: Add ACPI support to IPROC SDHCI"
Next in thread: Adrian Hunter: "Re: [PATCH] mmc: host: iproc: Add ACPI support to IPROC SDHCI"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]