Re: [PATCH net-next 10/10] net: mscc: ocelot: make use of SerDes PHYs for handling their configuration

From: Quentin Schulz
Date: Wed Aug 01 2018 - 03:52:00 EST


Hi Andrew,

On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 03:50:18PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 02:43:55PM +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>
> > + err = of_get_phy_mode(portnp);
> > + if (err < 0)
> > + ocelot->ports[port]->phy_mode = PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA;
> > + else
> > + ocelot->ports[port]->phy_mode = err;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->ports[port]->phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_NA)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + if (ocelot->ports[port]->phy_mode == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_SGMII)
> > + phy_mode = PHY_MODE_SGMII;
> > + else
> > + phy_mode = PHY_MODE_QSGMII;
>
> Hi Quentin
>
> Say somebody puts RGMII as the phy-mode? It would be better to verify
> it is only SGMII or QSGMII and return -EINVAL otherwise.
>

I'll replace this with a switch case to handle other cases.

> > +
> > + serdes = devm_of_phy_get(ocelot->dev, portnp, NULL);
> > + if (IS_ERR(serdes)) {
> > + if (PTR_ERR(serdes) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> > + dev_err(ocelot->dev, "deferring probe\n");
>
> dev_dbg() ? It is not really an error.
>

Ack.

> > + err = -EPROBE_DEFER;
> > + goto err_probe_ports;
> > + }
> > +
> > + dev_err(ocelot->dev, "missing SerDes phys for port%d\n",
> > + port);
> > + err = -ENODEV;
>
> err = PTR_ERR(serdes) so we get the actual error?
>

Ack.

Thanks,
Quentin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature