Re: Finish the GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER conversion

[Thomas Gleixner]

On Thu, 2 Aug 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:

> On Sun, 24 Jun 2018 06:15:25 PDT (-0700), tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> > > A while ago I sent a patch set that adds a GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER,
> > > which is an exact copy of the existing IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support in the
> > > arm port, which is being used unconditionally by arm64 and openrisc.
> > > GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER is currently being used by the RISC-V port.  I
> > > managed to make a few mistakes in my original patch set and as a result
> > > my conversion of the other architectures of GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER
> > > was dropped.
> > > 
> > > This patch set finishes up my original patch set by converting arm,
> > > arm64, and openrisc over to the new GENERIC_IRQ_MULTI_HANDLER support
> > > and then removing MULTI_IRQ_HANDLER as it's obselete.
> > > 
> > > At the time I wrote this I gave it fairly extensive build testing, but
> > > went I recently rebased it I just tested the full patch set on arm,
> > > arm64, and openrisc defconfigs.
> > > 
> > > Various flavors of this patch set have bounced around a few times
> > > before, but I'm calling this a whole new patch set as it builds on top
> > > of what was merged.
> > 
> > I'll take the whole pile through tip irq/core which probably makes the most
> > sense unless there are any objections from architecture maintainers.
> 
> Thanks!  Unless I've managed to screw something up I don't see these in your
> tree, but I also don't see any feedback from anyone else.

Yeah, I somehow managed to lose track of them. Picking them up now.