Re: SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU without constructors (was Re: [PATCH v4 13/17] khwasan: add hooks implementation)

From: Jan Kara
Date: Mon Aug 06 2018 - 16:20:26 EST


On Wed 01-08-18 10:46:35, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> I guess it would be useful to have such extensive comment for each
> SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU use explaining why it is needed and how all the
> tricky aspects are handled.
>
> For example, the one in jbd2 is interesting because it memsets the
> whole object before freeing it into SLAB_TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab:
>
> memset(jh, JBD2_POISON_FREE, sizeof(*jh));
> kmem_cache_free(jbd2_journal_head_cache, jh);
>
> I guess there are also tricky ways how it can all work in the end
> (type-stable state is only a byte, or we check for all possible
> combinations of being overwritten with JBD2_POISON_FREE). But at first
> sight it does look fishy.

The RCU access is used from a single place:

fs/jbd2/transaction.c: jbd2_write_access_granted()

There are also quite some comments explaining why what it does is safe. The
overwrite by JBD2_POISON_FREE is much older than this RCU stuff (honestly I
didn't know about it until this moment) and has nothing to do with the
safety of RCU access.

Honza

--
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR