Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM: dts: qcom: Add SPMI PMIC Arbiter nodes for APQ8084 and MSM8974

[Frank Rowand]

Hi All,

The email for Ivan is no longer valid.  Can anyone else help me with
my question?

Thanks,

Frank


On 08/31/18 15:46, Frank Rowand wrote:
> Hi Ivan,
> 
> 
> On 02/03/15 04:17, Ivan T. Ivanov wrote:
>> Add SPMI PMIC Arbiter configuration nodes for APQ8084 and MSM8974.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ivan T. Ivanov <iivanov@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> index 1f130bc..dbedf64 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8084.dtsi
>> @@ -226,5 +226,21 @@
>>  			clock-names = "core", "iface";
>>  			status = "disabled";
>>  		};
>> +
>> +		spmi_bus: spmi@fc4cf000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>> +			reg-names = "core", "intr", "cnfg";
>> +			reg = <0xfc4cf000 0x1000>,
>> +			      <0xfc4cb000 0x1000>,
>> +			      <0xfc4ca000 0x1000>;
>> +			interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
>> +			interrupts = <0 190 0>;> +			qcom,ee = <0>;
>> +			qcom,channel = <0>;
>> +			#address-cells = <2>;
>> +			#size-cells = <0>;
>> +			interrupt-controller;
>> +			#interrupt-cells = <4>;
>> +		};
>>  	};
>>  };
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> index e265ec1..2d11641 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-msm8974.dtsi
>> @@ -247,5 +247,21 @@
>>  			#address-cells = <1>;
>>  			#size-cells = <0>;
>>  		};
>> +
>> +		spmi_bus: spmi@fc4cf000 {
>> +			compatible = "qcom,spmi-pmic-arb";
>> +			reg-names = "core", "intr", "cnfg";
>> +			reg = <0xfc4cf000 0x1000>,
>> +			      <0xfc4cb000 0x1000>,
>> +			      <0xfc4ca000 0x1000>;
>> +			interrupt-names = "periph_irq";
> 
>> +			interrupts = <0 190 0>;
> 
> The final value in this interrupts property means IRQ_TYPE_NONE.
> 
> A WARN_ON() was added early this year to complain about use of
> IRQ_TYPE_NONE: 83a86fbb5b56 "irqchip/gic: Loudly complain about
> the use of IRQ_TYPE_NONE", resulting in many warnings spewing
> forth when I boot an APQ8074 Dragonboard.  I am trying to
> determine whether the warning is overly aggressive, or whether
> the IRQ TYPE is incorrectly specified for the spmi node.
> 
> The interrupt-parent for the spmi node is intc: interrupt-controller@f9000000,
> which has compatible = "qcom,msm-qgic2".  I do not know the architecture
> or implementation of this interrupt controller.  Is an IRQ_TYPE_NONE
> valid in this case, or should a specific type be provided?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Frank
> 
> 
>> +			qcom,ee = <0>;
>> +			qcom,channel = <0>;
>> +			#address-cells = <2>;
>> +			#size-cells = <0>;
>> +			interrupt-controller;
>> +			#interrupt-cells = <4>;
>> +		};
>>  	};
>>  };
>> --
>> 1.9.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
> 
> .
>