Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users

[Srinivas Kandagatla]

On 10/09/18 09:24, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> The API changes change so many things, that these series would be
> incompatible. I can send the series separately but they would be
> co-dependent anyway. Does it sound good?

What am asking is to reorder the patches in a such a way that its easy 
to review.
ex: Order can be :
1> kref and update nvmem_unregister followed by the provider changes.
2> Add support to cell tables, cell lookup, notifier
3> general cleanup patches  followed by fixes

Current set seems to jump from one thing to other which makes it hard to 
follow and time consuming while review!


--srini

> Bart