Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] nvmem: rework of the subsystem for non-DT users

[Bartosz Golaszewski]

2018-09-10 12:02 GMT+02:00 Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@xxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>
> On 10/09/18 09:24, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
>>
>> The API changes change so many things, that these series would be
>> incompatible. I can send the series separately but they would be
>> co-dependent anyway. Does it sound good?
>
>
> What am asking is to reorder the patches in a such a way that its easy to
> review.
> ex: Order can be :
> 1> kref and update nvmem_unregister followed by the provider changes.
> 2> Add support to cell tables, cell lookup, notifier
> 3> general cleanup patches  followed by fixes
>
> Current set seems to jump from one thing to other which makes it hard to
> follow and time consuming while review!
>

I would just change that ordering a bit: I think we should fix stuff
that's broken first, so fix the name field of struct nvmem_device,
then the rest as you listed it.

Bart