Re: [PATCH] switchtec: add customer events and comments PAX specific GFMS event

[Logan Gunthorpe]

On 13/09/18 01:34 AM, Wesley.Sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> From: Wesley Sheng <_Wesley.Sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <mailto:Wesley.Sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>

Similar to your previous patches, these are mangled by your email
client. It also would have also been better to send a small patch series
instead of these three individual patches.

  
> reserved for customers to implement up to 6 vendor-specific events, 24
> bytes per event
> comments on PAX specific GFMS event

Why do we need to merge this? You didn't present any code using these
new fields so this seems useless.

> Signed-off-by: Wesley Sheng <Wesley.Sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> include/linux/switchtec.h | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>  
> diff --git a/include/linux/switchtec.h b/include/linux/switchtec.h
> index ec93e93..e3cb8b8 100644
> --- a/include/linux/switchtec.h
> +++ b/include/linux/switchtec.h
> @@ -59,6 +59,12 @@ enum mrpc_status {
>          SWITCHTEC_MRPC_STATUS_INTERRUPTED = 0x100,
> };
>  
> +struct event {
> +       u32 hdr;
> +       u32 data[5];
> +};

This doesn't follow the way the other events are doing things, and you
didn't convert all the other events, so it just looks inconsistent.


Logan