Re: [PATCH v9 00/11] PM / Domains: Support hierarchical CPU arrangement (PSCI/ARM) (a subset)

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

On Thursday, October 4, 2018 10:58:53 AM CEST Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 4 October 2018 at 10:39, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 4:39 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> I have digested the review comments so far, including a recent offlist chat
> >> with with Lorenzo Pieralisi around the debatable PSCI changes. More or less I
> >> have a plan for how to move forward.
> >>
> >> However, to avoid re-posting non-changed patches over and over again, I decided
> >> to withhold the more debatable part from this v9, hence this is not the complete
> >> series to make things play. In v9, I have just included the trivial changes,
> >> which are either already acked/reviewed or hopefully can be rather soon/easily.
> >>
> >> My hope is to get this queued for v4.20, to move things forward. I know it's
> >> late, but there are more or less nothing new here since v8.
> >
> > I have no problems with the first three patches in this series, so I
> > can apply them right away.  Do you want me to do that?
> 
> Yes, please.
> 
> >
> > As for the rest, the cpuidle driver patch looks OK to me, but the
> > PSCI-related ones need ACKs.
> 
> For some yes, but I think you can go ahead with a few more.
> 
> Patch 4, 5 is already acked/reviewed.
> 
> Patch 6 should be fine (if you are okay with it else wait for an ack
> from Daniel)

OK, thanks.

Do the 4-6 depend on the 1-3?

> Patch 7 and 8 should be fine. They were suggested by Mark.

I'd rather have ACKs on these two as well.

> Patch 9 and 10 needs acks.
> 
> Patch 11 has been acked, but depends on the other PSCI changes.

OK