Re: [PATCH] regulator: fixed: Use more standard GPIO binding
From: Mark Brown
Date: Thu Oct 04 2018 - 09:54:34 EST
On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 01:32:13PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 12:50 PM Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 11:06:54AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > Optional properties:
> > > -- gpio: gpio to use for enable control
> > > +- gpios: gpio to use for enable control
> > Are we supposed to be able to have just plain gpios as a standards
> > conforming property or would best practice be to call it enable-gpios or
> > something?
> Oh I didn't think of that really. The gpio-regulator indeed uses
> enable-gpio for the same thing. But it complicates things codewise,
> as the GPIO line is also optional. I'm a bit uncertain, I tend
> to think just "gpios" is fine when the usage is unambigous. but
> I don't know what the DT maintainers think.
Right, well from my point of view -gpio is perfectly fine also so... :)
Rob?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature