Re: [PATCH net-next v8 28/28] net: WireGuard secure network tunnel

[Jason A. Donenfeld]

Hi Andrew,

On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:37 AM Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I can understand that. But on the flip side, CAKE reached something
> like version 19 before it got merged. Wireguard is looking similar.
> An addition like the above, is not controversial. You could submit
> such a single patch in a weeks time when net-next reopens, and
> probably version 1 or 2 will get accepted.

Alright, maybe I'll give it a try that way. Previously, every time I
wanted to send things upstream for WireGuard, I'd be sure to find
other users in the tree of what I was adding, since WireGuard wasn't
ready for patchsets yet. But I guess now that some series have begun,
it's more acceptable to add APIs here and there as you described.

Jason