Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] mm, memory_hotplug: print reason for the offlining failure

[Michal Hocko]

On Thu 08-11-18 11:53:21, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 11/07/2018 03:48 PM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > The memory offlining failure reporting is inconsistent and insufficient.
> > Some error paths simply do not report the failure to the log at all.
> > When we do report there are no details about the reason of the failure
> > and there are several of them which makes memory offlining failures
> > hard to debug.
> > 
> > Make sure that the
> > 	memory offlining [mem %#010llx-%#010llx] failed
> > message is printed for all failures and also provide a short textual
> > reason for the failure e.g.
> > 
> > [ 1984.506184] rac1 kernel: memory offlining [mem 0x82600000000-0x8267fffffff] failed due to signal backoff
> > 
> > this tells us that the offlining has failed because of a signal pending
> > aka user intervention.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
> 
> It might help to enumerate these failure reason strings and use macros.

Does it really make sense when all of them are on-off things? I would
agree if they were reused somewhere.

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs