[PATCH 02/17] futex: Use smp_store_release() in mark_wake_futex()
From: Henrik Austad
Date: Fri Nov 09 2018 - 05:09:39 EST
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 1b367ece0d7e696cab1c8501bab282cc6a538b3f upstream.
Since the futex_q can dissapear the instruction after assigning NULL,
this really should be a RELEASE barrier. That stops loads from hitting
dead memory too.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: juri.lelli@xxxxxxx
Cc: bigeasy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: xlpang@xxxxxxxxxx
Cc: rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jdesfossez@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: dvhart@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bristot@xxxxxxxxxx
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170322104151.604296452@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Henrik Austad <haustad@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/futex.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/futex.c b/kernel/futex.c
index bb87324..9e92f12 100644
--- a/kernel/futex.c
+++ b/kernel/futex.c
@@ -1284,8 +1284,7 @@ static void mark_wake_futex(struct wake_q_head *wake_q, struct futex_q *q)
* memory barrier is required here to prevent the following
* store to lock_ptr from getting ahead of the plist_del.
*/
- smp_wmb();
- q->lock_ptr = NULL;
+ smp_store_release(&q->lock_ptr, NULL);
}
static int wake_futex_pi(u32 __user *uaddr, u32 uval, struct futex_q *top_waiter,
--
2.7.4