Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Static calls

[Andy Lutomirski]

On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:28 PM Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> All other usecases are bonus, but it would certainly be interesting to
> investigate the impact of using these APIs for tracing: that too is a
> feature enabled everywhere but utilized only by a small fraction of Linux
> users - so literally every single cycle or instruction saved or hot-path
> shortened is a major win.

For tracing, we'd want static_call_set_to_nop() or something like that, right?

--Andy