Re: Official Linux system wrapper library?

[Vlastimil Babka]

On 11/10/18 8:20 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 10, 2018 at 10:52:06AM -0800, Daniel Colascione wrote:
>> Now that glibc is basically not adding any new system call wrappers,
> 
> Why are they not doing that anymore?

FYI just noticed there's a topic relevant to this in LPC Toolchain MC:

https://linuxplumbersconf.org/event/2/contributions/149/

> And there's no reason you have to use glibc, there are many other libcs
> out there that hopefully are adding the new syscalls :)
> 
>> how about publishing an "official" system call glue library as part of
>> the kernel distribution, along with the uapi headers? I don't think
>> it's reasonable to expect people to keep using syscall(__NR_XXX) for
>> all new functionality, especially as the system grows increasingly
>> sophisticated capabilities (like the new mount API, and hopefully the
>> new process API) outside the strictures of the POSIX process.
> 
> Patches are always welcome to be reviewed.  But watch out that they
> don't conflict with the libc headers.  I know we had a "klibc" proposed
> a long time ago but that died off for various reasons before it could
> get merged.
> 
> Also, what about the basic work of making sure our uapi header files can
> actually be used untouched by a libc?  That isn't the case these days as
> the bionic maintainers like to keep reminding me.  That might be a good
> thing to do _before_ trying to add new things like syscall wrappers.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h
>