[PATCH tip/core/rcu 20/20] doc: Fix "struction" typo in RCU memory-ordering documentation

[Paul E. McKenney]

From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

This commit replaces "struction" with the correct "structure".

Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 .../RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html    | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html
index a346ce0116eb..e4d94fba6c89 100644
--- a/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html
+++ b/Documentation/RCU/Design/Memory-Ordering/Tree-RCU-Memory-Ordering.html
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ The key point is that the lock-acquisition functions, including
 <tt>smp_mb__after_unlock_lock()</tt> immediately after successful
 acquisition of the lock.
 
-<p>Therefore, for any given <tt>rcu_node</tt> struction, any access
+<p>Therefore, for any given <tt>rcu_node</tt> structure, any access
 happening before one of the above lock-release functions will be seen
 by all CPUs as happening before any access happening after a later
 one of the above lock-acquisition functions.
-- 
2.17.1