[PATCH 3.16 005/366] staging: rtl8192ee: Fix misleading indentation

From: Ben Hutchings
Date: Sun Nov 11 2018 - 15:41:41 EST


3.16.61-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Fix the compiler warnings:

drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/rtl8192ee/hw.c:524:4: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard...
drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/rtl8192ee/hw.c:529:5: warning: this 'if' clause does not guard...
drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/btcoexist/halbtc8821a2ant.c:2338:2: warning: this 'else' clause does not guard...

by changing the indentation of these statements to match the upstream
code in drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/rtl8192ee/hw.c and
drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi/btcoexist/halbtc8821a2ant.c.

These were fixed upstream when the driver was removed from staging and
re-added with some clean-ups.

Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/rtl8192ee/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/rtl8192ee/hw.c
@@ -523,17 +523,17 @@ void rtl92ee_set_hw_reg(struct ieee80211
fac = (1 << (fac + 2));
if (fac > 0xf)
fac = 0xf;
- for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
+ for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
if ((reg[i] & 0xf0) > (fac << 4))
reg[i] = (reg[i] & 0x0f) | (fac << 4);
if ((reg[i] & 0x0f) > fac)
reg[i] = (reg[i] & 0xf0) | fac;
- rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv,
- (REG_AGGLEN_LMT + i),
- reg[i]);
- }
- RT_TRACE(COMP_MLME, DBG_LOUD,
- ("Set HW_VAR_AMPDU_FACTOR:%#x\n", fac));
+ rtl_write_byte(rtlpriv,
+ (REG_AGGLEN_LMT + i),
+ reg[i]);
+ }
+ RT_TRACE(COMP_MLME, DBG_LOUD,
+ ("Set HW_VAR_AMPDU_FACTOR:%#x\n", fac));
}
break; }
case HW_VAR_AC_PARAM:{
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/btcoexist/halbtc8821a2ant.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192ee/btcoexist/halbtc8821a2ant.c
@@ -2339,8 +2339,8 @@ static void halbtc8821a2ant_action_pan_e
halbtc8821a2ant_coex_table(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, 0x55ff55ff,
0x5aff5aff, 0xffff, 0x3);

- if (BTC_WIFI_BW_HT40 == wifi_bw) {
- /* fw mechanism */
+ if (BTC_WIFI_BW_HT40 == wifi_bw) {
+ /* fw mechanism */
if ((bt_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_HIGH) ||
(bt_rssi_state == BTC_RSSI_STATE_STAY_HIGH))
ps21a_tdma(btcoexist, NORMAL_EXEC, true, 1);