[PATCH 4.14 032/222] sched/fair: Fix the min_vruntime update logic in dequeue_entity()
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Date: Sun Nov 11 2018 - 18:04:53 EST
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Song Muchun <smuchun@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 9845c49cc9bbb317a0bc9e9cf78d8e09d54c9af0 ]
The comment and the code around the update_min_vruntime() call in
dequeue_entity() are not in agreement.
>From commit:
b60205c7c558 ("sched/fair: Fix min_vruntime tracking")
I think that we want to update min_vruntime when a task is sleeping/migrating.
So, the check is inverted there - fix it.
Signed-off-by: Song Muchun <smuchun@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@xxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: b60205c7c558 ("sched/fair: Fix min_vruntime tracking")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181014112612.2614-1-smuchun@xxxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3825,7 +3825,7 @@ dequeue_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, st
* put back on, and if we advance min_vruntime, we'll be placed back
* further than we started -- ie. we'll be penalized.
*/
- if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) == DEQUEUE_SAVE)
+ if ((flags & (DEQUEUE_SAVE | DEQUEUE_MOVE)) != DEQUEUE_SAVE)
update_min_vruntime(cfs_rq);
}