[PATCH 4.18 279/350] rtc: cmos: Remove the `use_acpi_alarm module parameter for !ACPI

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

commit bc51098cdd9573bfdecfd02fc8ed474419d73ea0 upstream.

Fix a problem with commit 311ee9c151ad ("rtc: cmos: allow using ACPI for
RTC alarm instead of HPET") defining `use_acpi_alarm' module parameter
even for non-ACPI platforms, which ignore it.  Wrap the definition into
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI and use a static inline wrapper function, hardcoded
to return 0 and consequently optimized away for !ACPI, following the
existing pattern with HPET handling functions.

Signed-off-by: Maciej W. Rozycki <macro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: 311ee9c151ad ("rtc: cmos: allow using ACPI for RTC alarm instead of HPET")
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.18+
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

---
 drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
+++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cmos.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
 /* this is for "generic access to PC-style RTC" using CMOS_READ/CMOS_WRITE */
 #include <linux/mc146818rtc.h>
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
 /*
  * Use ACPI SCI to replace HPET interrupt for RTC Alarm event
  *
@@ -61,6 +62,18 @@
 static bool use_acpi_alarm;
 module_param(use_acpi_alarm, bool, 0444);
 
+static inline int cmos_use_acpi_alarm(void)
+{
+	return use_acpi_alarm;
+}
+#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
+
+static inline int cmos_use_acpi_alarm(void)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
+
 struct cmos_rtc {
 	struct rtc_device	*rtc;
 	struct device		*dev;
@@ -169,7 +182,7 @@ static inline int hpet_unregister_irq_ha
 /* Don't use HPET for RTC Alarm event if ACPI Fixed event is used */
 static inline int use_hpet_alarm(void)
 {
-	return is_hpet_enabled() && !use_acpi_alarm;
+	return is_hpet_enabled() && !cmos_use_acpi_alarm();
 }
 
 /*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
@@ -340,7 +353,7 @@ static void cmos_irq_enable(struct cmos_
 	if (use_hpet_alarm())
 		hpet_set_rtc_irq_bit(mask);
 
-	if ((mask & RTC_AIE) && use_acpi_alarm) {
+	if ((mask & RTC_AIE) && cmos_use_acpi_alarm()) {
 		if (cmos->wake_on)
 			cmos->wake_on(cmos->dev);
 	}
@@ -358,7 +371,7 @@ static void cmos_irq_disable(struct cmos
 	if (use_hpet_alarm())
 		hpet_mask_rtc_irq_bit(mask);
 
-	if ((mask & RTC_AIE) && use_acpi_alarm) {
+	if ((mask & RTC_AIE) && cmos_use_acpi_alarm()) {
 		if (cmos->wake_off)
 			cmos->wake_off(cmos->dev);
 	}
@@ -980,7 +993,7 @@ static int cmos_suspend(struct device *d
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irq(&rtc_lock);
 
-	if ((tmp & RTC_AIE) && !use_acpi_alarm) {
+	if ((tmp & RTC_AIE) && !cmos_use_acpi_alarm()) {
 		cmos->enabled_wake = 1;
 		if (cmos->wake_on)
 			cmos->wake_on(dev);
@@ -1031,7 +1044,7 @@ static void cmos_check_wkalrm(struct dev
 	 * ACPI RTC wake event is cleared after resume from STR,
 	 * ACK the rtc irq here
 	 */
-	if (t_now >= cmos->alarm_expires && use_acpi_alarm) {
+	if (t_now >= cmos->alarm_expires && cmos_use_acpi_alarm()) {
 		cmos_interrupt(0, (void *)cmos->rtc);
 		return;
 	}
@@ -1053,7 +1066,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused cmos_resume(st
 	struct cmos_rtc	*cmos = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 	unsigned char tmp;
 
-	if (cmos->enabled_wake && !use_acpi_alarm) {
+	if (cmos->enabled_wake && !cmos_use_acpi_alarm()) {
 		if (cmos->wake_off)
 			cmos->wake_off(dev);
 		else
@@ -1132,7 +1145,7 @@ static u32 rtc_handler(void *context)
 	 * Or else, ACPI SCI is enabled during suspend/resume only,
 	 * update rtc irq in that case.
 	 */
-	if (use_acpi_alarm)
+	if (cmos_use_acpi_alarm())
 		cmos_interrupt(0, (void *)cmos->rtc);
 	else {
 		/* Fix me: can we use cmos_interrupt() here as well? */