[PATCH 4.18 057/350] perf report: Dont crash on invalid inline debug information

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@xxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit d4046e8e17b9f378cb861982ef71c63911b5dff3 ]

When the function name for an inline frame is invalid, we must not try
to demangle this symbol, otherwise we crash with:

  #0  0x0000555555895c01 in bfd_demangle ()
  #1  0x0000555555823262 in demangle_sym (dso=0x555555d92b90, elf_name=0x0, kmodule=0) at util/symbol-elf.c:215
  #2  dso__demangle_sym (dso=dso@entry=0x555555d92b90, kmodule=<optimized out>, kmodule@entry=0, elf_name=elf_name@entry=0x0) at util/symbol-elf.c:400
  #3  0x00005555557fef4b in new_inline_sym (funcname=0x0, base_sym=0x555555d92b90, dso=0x555555d92b90) at util/srcline.c:89
  #4  inline_list__append_dso_a2l (dso=dso@entry=0x555555c7bb00, node=node@entry=0x555555e31810, sym=sym@entry=0x555555d92b90) at util/srcline.c:264
  #5  0x00005555557ff27f in addr2line (dso_name=dso_name@entry=0x555555d92430 "/home/milian/.debug/.build-id/f7/186d14bb94f3c6161c010926da66033d24fce5/elf", addr=addr@entry=2888, file=file@entry=0x0,
      line=line@entry=0x0, dso=dso@entry=0x555555c7bb00, unwind_inlines=unwind_inlines@entry=true, node=0x555555e31810, sym=0x555555d92b90) at util/srcline.c:313
  #6  0x00005555557ffe7c in addr2inlines (sym=0x555555d92b90, dso=0x555555c7bb00, addr=2888, dso_name=0x555555d92430 "/home/milian/.debug/.build-id/f7/186d14bb94f3c6161c010926da66033d24fce5/elf")
      at util/srcline.c:358

So instead handle the case where we get invalid function names for
inlined frames and use a fallback '??' function name instead.

While this crash was originally reported by Hadrien for rust code, I can
now also reproduce it with trivial C++ code. Indeed, it seems like
libbfd fails to interpret the debug information for the inline frame
symbol name:

  $ addr2line -e /home/milian/.debug/.build-id/f7/186d14bb94f3c6161c010926da66033d24fce5/elf -if b48
  main
  /usr/include/c++/8.2.1/complex:610
  ??
  /usr/include/c++/8.2.1/complex:618
  ??
  /usr/include/c++/8.2.1/complex:675
  ??
  /usr/include/c++/8.2.1/complex:685
  main
  /home/milian/projects/kdab/rnd/hotspot/tests/test-clients/cpp-inlining/main.cpp:39

I've reported this bug upstream and also attached a patch there which
should fix this issue:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23715

Reported-by: Hadrien Grasland <grasland@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jin Yao <yao.jin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@xxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: a64489c56c30 ("perf report: Find the inline stack for a given address")
[ The above 'Fixes:' cset is where originally the problem was
  introduced, i.e.  using a2l->funcname without checking if it is NULL,
  but this current patch fixes the current codebase, i.e. multiple csets
  were applied after a64489c56c30 before the problem was reported by Hadrien ]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180926135207.30263-3-milian.wolff@xxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/perf/util/srcline.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/srcline.c
@@ -85,6 +85,9 @@ static struct symbol *new_inline_sym(str
 	struct symbol *inline_sym;
 	char *demangled = NULL;
 
+	if (!funcname)
+		funcname = "??";
+
 	if (dso) {
 		demangled = dso__demangle_sym(dso, 0, funcname);
 		if (demangled)