[PATCH 4.19 122/361] gpio: brcmstb: allow 0 width GPIO banks

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Justin Chen <justinpopo6@xxxxxxxxx>

[ Upstream commit bfba223dcc4548632d8f3bfd15690a86d4c68504 ]

Sometimes we have empty banks within the GPIO block. This commit allows
proper handling of 0 width GPIO banks. We handle 0 width GPIO banks by
incrementing the bank and number of GPIOs, but not initializing them.
This will mean a call into the non-existent GPIOs will return an error.

Also remove "GPIO registered" dev print. This information is misleading
since the incremented banks and gpio_base do not reflect the actual GPIOs
that get initialized. We leave this information out since it is already
printed with dev_dbg.

Signed-off-by: Justin Chen <justinpopo6@xxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c |   15 ++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-brcmstb.c
@@ -664,6 +664,18 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct pla
 		struct brcmstb_gpio_bank *bank;
 		struct gpio_chip *gc;
 
+		/*
+		 * If bank_width is 0, then there is an empty bank in the
+		 * register block. Special handling for this case.
+		 */
+		if (bank_width == 0) {
+			dev_dbg(dev, "Width 0 found: Empty bank @ %d\n",
+				num_banks);
+			num_banks++;
+			gpio_base += MAX_GPIO_PER_BANK;
+			continue;
+		}
+
 		bank = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*bank), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!bank) {
 			err = -ENOMEM;
@@ -740,9 +752,6 @@ static int brcmstb_gpio_probe(struct pla
 			goto fail;
 	}
 
-	dev_info(dev, "Registered %d banks (GPIO(s): %d-%d)\n",
-			num_banks, priv->gpio_base, gpio_base - 1);
-
 	if (priv->parent_wake_irq && need_wakeup_event)
 		pm_wakeup_event(dev, 0);