Re: [PATCH 1/2] RISC-V: Request stat64 on RV32

From: Palmer Dabbelt
Date: Mon Nov 12 2018 - 12:01:49 EST


On Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:19:02 PST (-0800), david.abdurachmanov@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 5:10 AM Zong Li <zongbox@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The stat64 family that is used on 32-bit architectures to replace
newstat.

Since commit 67314ec7b0250290cc85eaa7a2f88a8ddb9e8547 ("RISC-V: Request
newstat syscalls"), the RV32 build fail with undeclared 'sys_fstatat64'

Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h
index eff7aa9..a4aade9 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h
+++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h
@@ -18,5 +18,6 @@

#define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT
#define __ARCH_WANT_SYS_CLONE
+#define __ARCH_WANT_STAT64
#include <uapi/asm/unistd.h>
#include <uapi/asm/syscalls.h>
--

See: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2018-November/002087.html

The plan is not to have old stat syscalls and support statx on
riscv32, which is y2038 safe.

The issue you see is a bug in include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h.
Marcin (CC) already sent a patch to Arnd (CC) IIRC. Basically without
__ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT or __ARCH_WANT_STAT64 two macros are not defined:
__NR3264_fstatat and __NR3264_fstat. Which is later used (without any
guards):

763 #define __NR_newfstatat __NR3264_fstatat
764 #define __NR_fstat __NR3264_fstat

I agree. Thanks!