Re: [PATCH 2/2] exec: increase BINPRM_BUF_SIZE to 256
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Nov 13 2018 - 15:43:09 EST
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 17:55:58 +0100 Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > However it would be basically cost-free to increase
> > BINPRM_BUF_SIZE up to the point where sizeof(struct linux_binprm) ==
> > PAGE_SIZE?
>
> I don't think we should take sizeof(struct linux_binprm) into account, the
> new members can come at any time and we can never decrease BINPRM_BUF_SIZE.
My main point is.. why not make BINPRM_BUF_SIZE a lot larger than 256?