Re: [PATCH 1/2] ASoC: ak4118: Add support for AK4118 S/PDIF transceiver
From: ClÃment PÃron
Date: Wed Nov 14 2018 - 05:55:32 EST
Hi Mark,
On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 23:51, Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 01:49:33PM +0100, ClÃment PÃron wrote:
>
> This looks mostly good, a few small things below but nothing too major:
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/ak4118.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,449 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * ak4118.c -- Asahi Kasei ALSA Soc Audio driver
> > + *
>
> Please make the entire comment a C++ one so this looks more intentional.
I check from other files and also this article says :
"For normal C source files, the string will be a comment using the
"//" syntax; header files, instead, use traditional (/* */) comments
for reasons related to tooling"
https://lwn.net/Articles/739183/
>
> > +static const char * const ak4118_iec958_fs_texts[] = {
> > + "44100",
> > + "Reserved",
>
> If you use a _VALUE_ENUM_SINGLE you can hide the reserved/invalid values
> from userspace which is easier to use.
Ok will change to SOC_VALUE_ENUM_SINGLE_DECL
>
> > + ret = request_threaded_irq(gpiod_to_irq(ak4118->irq), NULL,
> > + ak4118_irq_handler, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
> > + IRQF_ONESHOT, "ak4118-irq", ak4118);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(component->dev, "Fail to request_irq: %d\n", ret);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
>
> You should request resources in the device level probe, there's no point
> in requesting and releasing the interrupt like this.
Ok, will change to devm_request_threaded_irq and remove the irq_free
Thanks for the review,
Regards,
ClÃment