general protection fault in __bfs

From: syzbot
Date: Wed Dec 12 2018 - 05:57:12 EST

Next message: Viresh Kumar: "[PATCH V3 0/6] PM / Domains: Allow performance state propagation"
Previous message: syzbot: "general protection fault in __ip_append_data"
Next in thread: Dmitry Vyukov: "Re: general protection fault in __bfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Hello,

syzbot found the following crash on:

HEAD commit: f5d582777bcb Merge branch 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel...
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1657b01b400000
kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=c8970c89a0efbb23
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9af93090b1662f253d62
compiler: gcc (GCC) 8.0.1 20180413 (experimental)
userspace arch: i386
syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=118448cd400000
C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=17f32705400000

IMPORTANT: if you fix the bug, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+9af93090b1662f253d62@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Enabling of bearer <udp:syz1> rejected, already enabled
Enabling of bearer <udp:syz1> rejected, already enabled
Enabling of bearer <udp:syz1> rejected, already enabled
kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
CPU: 0 PID: 9250 Comm: syz-executor424 Not tainted 4.20.0-rc6+ #274
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
RIP: 0010:lock_accessed kernel/locking/lockdep.c:964 [inline]
RIP: 0010:__bfs+0x3d9/0x780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1032
Code: 7c 24 c0 41 c6 45 00 f8 74 7c 49 8d 7f 10 4c 89 fe 4c 8b 0d 89 8a aa 09 48 89 f8 48 81 ee 20 55 eb 8a 48 c1 e8 03 48 c1 fe 06 <42> 80 3c 30 00 0f 85 d4 01 00 00 4d 8b 47 10 49 8d 40 2c 48 89 c7
RSP: 0018:ffff8881dae06c88 EFLAGS: 00010003
RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffffffff8ae100d0 RCX: 1ffff1103b5c0db1
RDX: 1ffffffff15c201a RSI: 0000000001d452ab RDI: 0000000000000010
RBP: ffff8881dae06df0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000001b46
R10: ffffed103b5c5b5f R11: ffff8881c3dba240 R12: ffff8881dae06dc8
R13: ffffed103b5c0db1 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881dae00000(0063) knlGS:0000000009355840
CS: 0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000008100000 CR3: 00000001c34e9000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
Call Trace:
<IRQ>
__bfs_forwards kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1060 [inline]
find_usage_forwards kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1360 [inline]
check_usage_forwards+0x163/0x3d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2572
mark_lock_irq kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2687 [inline]
mark_lock+0x9b5/0x1cd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3059
mark_irqflags kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2937 [inline]
__lock_acquire+0x155f/0x4c20 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3298
lock_acquire+0x1ed/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3844
__raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
_raw_spin_lock+0x2d/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:144
spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:329 [inline]
__queue_work+0xc1b/0x1440 kernel/workqueue.c:1414
delayed_work_timer_fn+0x5d/0x90 kernel/workqueue.c:1500
call_timer_fn+0x272/0x920 kernel/time/timer.c:1326
expire_timers kernel/time/timer.c:1359 [inline]
__run_timers+0x723/0xc70 kernel/time/timer.c:1682
run_timer_softirq+0x52/0xb0 kernel/time/timer.c:1695
__do_softirq+0x308/0xb7e kernel/softirq.c:292
invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:373 [inline]
irq_exit+0x17f/0x1c0 kernel/softirq.c:413
exiting_irq arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h:536 [inline]
smp_apic_timer_interrupt+0x1cb/0x760 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1061
apic_timer_interrupt+0xf/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:807
</IRQ>
RIP: 0010:arch_local_irq_restore arch/x86/include/asm/paravirt.h:761 [inline]
RIP: 0010:console_unlock+0xf41/0x1190 kernel/printk/printk.c:2422
Code: 48 89 f8 48 c1 e8 03 42 80 3c 30 00 0f 85 54 02 00 00 48 83 3d 9f 84 ec 07 00 74 72 e8 18 08 1a 00 48 8b bd b0 fe ff ff 57 9d <0f> 1f 44 00 00 e9 f3 f2 ff ff e8 00 08 1a 00 0f 0b e8 f9 07 1a 00
RSP: 0018:ffff8881d9246d08 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffff13
RAX: ffff8881c3dba240 RBX: 0000000000000200 RCX: 1ffff110387b756b
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff81657c58 RDI: 0000000000000293
RBP: ffff8881d9246e78 R08: ffff8881c3dbab58 R09: 0000000000000006
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff8881c3dba240 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffffffff849c4410 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: ffffffff89b639d0
vprintk_emit+0x391/0x990 kernel/printk/printk.c:1922
vprintk_default+0x28/0x30 kernel/printk/printk.c:1964
vprintk_func+0x7e/0x181 kernel/printk/printk_safe.c:398
printk+0xa7/0xcf kernel/printk/printk.c:1997
tipc_enable_bearer+0x4ad/0xf10 net/tipc/bearer.c:338
__tipc_nl_bearer_enable+0x37c/0x4a0 net/tipc/bearer.c:897
tipc_nl_bearer_enable+0x22/0x30 net/tipc/bearer.c:905
genl_family_rcv_msg+0x8a7/0x11a0 net/netlink/genetlink.c:601
genl_rcv_msg+0xc6/0x168 net/netlink/genetlink.c:626
netlink_rcv_skb+0x172/0x440 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2477
genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:637
netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1310 [inline]
netlink_unicast+0x5a5/0x760 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1336
netlink_sendmsg+0xa18/0xfc0 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1917
sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:621 [inline]
sock_sendmsg+0xd5/0x120 net/socket.c:631
___sys_sendmsg+0x7fd/0x930 net/socket.c:2116
__sys_sendmsg+0x11d/0x280 net/socket.c:2154
__compat_sys_sendmsg net/compat.c:754 [inline]
__do_compat_sys_sendmsg net/compat.c:761 [inline]
__se_compat_sys_sendmsg net/compat.c:758 [inline]
__ia32_compat_sys_sendmsg+0x7a/0xb0 net/compat.c:758
do_syscall_32_irqs_on arch/x86/entry/common.c:326 [inline]
do_fast_syscall_32+0x34d/0xfb2 arch/x86/entry/common.c:397
entry_SYSENTER_compat+0x70/0x7f arch/x86/entry/entry_64_compat.S:139
RIP: 0023:0xf7f0fa29
Code: 85 d2 74 02 89 0a 5b 5d c3 8b 04 24 c3 8b 14 24 c3 8b 3c 24 c3 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 51 52 55 89 e5 0f 34 cd 80 <5d> 5a 59 c3 90 90 90 90 eb 0d 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
RSP: 002b:000000000820fd6c EFLAGS: 00000213 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000172
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 0000000020001e40
RDX: 0000000000000080 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000122
RBP: 0000000000010b54 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
Modules linked in:
---[ end trace fc7927d741510429 ]---
RIP: 0010:lock_accessed kernel/locking/lockdep.c:964 [inline]
RIP: 0010:__bfs+0x3d9/0x780 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1032
Code: 7c 24 c0 41 c6 45 00 f8 74 7c 49 8d 7f 10 4c 89 fe 4c 8b 0d 89 8a aa 09 48 89 f8 48 81 ee 20 55 eb 8a 48 c1 e8 03 48 c1 fe 06 <42> 80 3c 30 00 0f 85 d4 01 00 00 4d 8b 47 10 49 8d 40 2c 48 89 c7
RSP: 0018:ffff8881dae06c88 EFLAGS: 00010003
RAX: 0000000000000002 RBX: ffffffff8ae100d0 RCX: 1ffff1103b5c0db1
RDX: 1ffffffff15c201a RSI: 0000000001d452ab RDI: 0000000000000010
RBP: ffff8881dae06df0 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000001b46
R10: ffffed103b5c5b5f R11: ffff8881c3dba240 R12: ffff8881dae06dc8
R13: ffffed103b5c0db1 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8881dae00000(0063) knlGS:0000000009355840
CS: 0010 DS: 002b ES: 002b CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 0000000008100000 CR3: 00000001c34e9000 CR4: 00000000001406f0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400

---
This bug is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

syzbot will keep track of this bug report. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bug-status-tracking for how to communicate with syzbot.
syzbot can test patches for this bug, for details see:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#testing-patches

Next message: Viresh Kumar: "[PATCH V3 0/6] PM / Domains: Allow performance state propagation"
Previous message: syzbot: "general protection fault in __ip_append_data"
Next in thread: Dmitry Vyukov: "Re: general protection fault in __bfs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]