Re: [PATCH 2/4] ARM: tegra: avoid section mismatch warning

[Olof Johansson]

On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:28:56AM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:08:53AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 11:05 AM Thierry Reding
> > <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 10:58:37PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > > WARNING: vmlinux.o(.text+0x39ecc): Section mismatch in reference from the function tegra114_gic_cpu_pm_registration() to the (unknown reference) .init.rodata:(unknown)
> > > > The function tegra114_gic_cpu_pm_registration() references
> > > > the (unknown reference) __initconst (unknown).
> > > > This is often because tegra114_gic_cpu_pm_registration lacks a __initconst
> > > > annotation or the annotation of (unknown) is wrong.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  arch/arm/mach-tegra/irq.c | 4 ++--
> > > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > I'm not seeing these. Do I need to enable any special options to trigger
> > > these? Or are these just so new that I haven't run into them yet?
> > 
> > My guess would be that this is a result of the CONFIG_NO_AUTO_INLINE
> > option that is now available in linux-next.
> 
> Okay, that would explain. It's not set in my configurations currently.
> 
> Do you want to apply this to ARM-SoC directly with my Acked-by, or
> should I queue it up for v4.22?

I'm picking up a few others of these, so I'll include it in that batch.

Applied to arm-soc next/soc.


Thanks!


-Olof