Re: [PATCH v10 17/27] drivers: firmware: psci: Prepare to support PM domains

[Daniel Lezcano]

On 20/12/2018 22:37, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 19:06, Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> On 20/12/2018 16:49, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>
>> [ ... ]
>>
>>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
>>>>
>>>> It would be nicer if you can remove the CONFIG_CPU_IDLE by replacing it
>>>> with a specific one (eg. CONFIG_PSCI_IDLE) and make it depend on
>>>> CONFIG_CPU_IDLE, so the config options stay contained in their
>>>> respective subsystems directory.
>>>
>>> I am all for simplifying the Kconfig options in here, as indeed it's
>>> rather messy. However, I would rather avoid folding in additional
>>> cleanup changes to this series, is already extensive enough.
>>>
>>> Would you be okay if we deal with that on top?
>>
>> IMO, there are patches in this series which can be grouped into a
>> cleanup + set the scene patchset and merged immediately. An option
>> similar to ARM_SCMI_POWER_DOMAIN can be part of it.
> 
> I certainly agree to that. The tricky is, to know what pieces people
> are happy with to go in. :-)
> 
> Earlier, in v9 I tried your suggested approach (kind of), but then
> Lorenzo stated that it's kind of all or nothing. Maybe we can bring up
> that discussion again with him and see what we can figure out.
> 
>>
>> However, if you swear you will do the change after and sign with your
>> blood, I'm fine with that 0:)
>>
> 
> Whatever it takes!
> 
> Anyway, as stated, the reason why I want to tackle that on top, is
> that I don't want to make the series more extensive than it already
> is.
> 
> Agree?

Yes

-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org â Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog