Re: [PATCH v4] mmc: mxs-mmc: Introduce regulator support

From: Ulf Hansson
Date: Mon Jan 28 2019 - 16:16:03 EST


On Mon, 28 Jan 2019 at 15:41, Martin Kepplinger <martink@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> This adds support for explicitly switching the mmc's power on and off
> which is needed for example for WL1837 WL1271 wifi controllers on imx28.
>
> While the wifi's vmmc-supply regulator can be configured in devicetree,
> "ip link set wlan0 down" doesn't turn off the VMMC regulator which leads
> to hangs when loading firmware, for example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Kepplinger <martin.kepplinger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
>
> revision history
> ----------------
> v4: re-added forgotten regulator_enable() during probe
> v3: improve API usage as suggested by Ulf
> v2: tested patch with changes suggested by Robin
> v1: question, why https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4365751/ didn't get in
>
>
> drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> index add1e70195ea..23d275269d61 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/mxs-mmc.c
> @@ -517,6 +517,22 @@ static void mxs_mmc_set_ios(struct mmc_host *mmc, struct mmc_ios *ios)
> else
> host->bus_width = 0;
>
> + switch (ios->power_mode) {
> + case MMC_POWER_OFF:
> + if (!IS_ERR(host->mmc->supply.vmmc))
> + mmc_regulator_set_ocr(host->mmc,
> + host->mmc->supply.vmmc, 0);
> + break;
> + case MMC_POWER_UP:
> + if (!IS_ERR(host->mmc->supply.vmmc))
> + mmc_regulator_set_ocr(host->mmc,
> + host->mmc->supply.vmmc,
> + ios->vdd);
> + break;
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
> +
> if (ios->clock)
> mxs_ssp_set_clk_rate(&host->ssp, ios->clock);
> }
> @@ -588,7 +604,6 @@ static int mxs_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct mmc_host *mmc;
> struct resource *iores;
> int ret = 0, irq_err;
> - struct regulator *reg_vmmc;
> struct mxs_ssp *ssp;
>
> irq_err = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> @@ -614,14 +629,15 @@ static int mxs_mmc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> host->mmc = mmc;
> host->sdio_irq_en = 0;
>
> - reg_vmmc = devm_regulator_get(&pdev->dev, "vmmc");
> - if (!IS_ERR(reg_vmmc)) {
> - ret = regulator_enable(reg_vmmc);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> - "Failed to enable vmmc regulator: %d\n", ret);
> - goto out_mmc_free;
> - }
> + ret = mmc_regulator_get_supply(mmc);
> + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> + goto out_mmc_free;
> +
> + ret = regulator_enable(mmc->supply.vmmc);

This is wrong, as it may cause the regulator usage count to become
wrongly balanced.

Instead, via ->set_ios() when calling mmc_regulator_set_ocr(), it will
take care of enabling and disabling the regulator depending of the
requested vdd voltage level.

> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev,
> + "Failed to enable vmmc regulator: %d\n", ret);
> + goto out_mmc_free;
> }
>
> ssp->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> --
> 2.20.1
>

BTW, you didn't really answer my earlier question about the TI WiFi
chip. Doesn't you need a special clock for WiFi chip as well? How do
you intend to manage that?

Kind regards
Uffe