Re: [PATCH v6 6/6] arm64: dts: Add Mediatek SoC MT8183 and evaluation board dts and Makefile

[Erin Lo]

On Thu, 2019-02-07 at 16:08 +0100, Matthias Brugger wrote:
> 
> On 01/02/2019 06:11, Erin Lo wrote:
> > Add back more people since mail server issue
> > 
> > On Fri, 2019-02-01 at 11:33 +0800, Erin Lo wrote:
> >> On Thu, 2019-01-31 at 15:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 8:34 PM Erin Lo <erin.lo@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, 2019-01-30 at 10:22 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 04:07:20PM +0800, Erin Lo wrote:
> >>>>>> From: Ben Ho <Ben.Ho@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Add basic chip support for Mediatek 8183, include
> >>>>>> pinctrl file, uart node with correct uart clocks, pwrap device
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Add clock controller nodes, include topckgen, infracfg,
> >>>>>> apmixedsys and subsystem.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Ho <Ben.Ho@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Erin Lo <erin.lo@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Seiya Wang <seiya.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhiyong Tao <zhiyong.tao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Weiyi Lu <weiyi.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Mengqi Zhang <Mengqi.Zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> +   sysirq: intpol-controller@c530a80 {
> >>>>>
> >>>>> interrupt-controller@...
> >>>>
> >>>> I will modify it in next version.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Place all the MMIO peripherals under one or more simple-bus nodes.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Rob
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Do you mean need to add simple-bus like this?
> >>>
> >>> Yes.
> >>
> >> We remove soc because Matthias suggested it in former MTK SoC maybe in
> >> 2015 year.
> >>
> >> We will add it back by your comment.
> >>
> >> Thank you. 
> >>
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Erin
> > 
> > Hi, Matthias,
> > Do you have any comment here?
> 
> Although I wasn't able to find it in the documentation my understanding is, that
> all devices on-chip should be under soc "bus".
> 
> I'm sorry if I created confusion with comments in the past.
> 
> Regards,
> Matthias
> 

OK! we will add soc "bus" back in next version.
Thank you for your comment.

Best Regards,
Erin

> > Thanks
> > 
> > Best Regards,
> > Erin
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> +   soc: soc {
> >>>> +                #address-cells = <0x1>;
> >>>> +                #size-cells = <0x1>;
> >>>> +                ranges = <0 0 0 0xffffffff>;
> >>>> +                compatible = "simple-bus";
> >>>>
> >>>>                 soc_data: soc_data@08000000 {
> >>>>                         compatible = "mediatek,mt8183-efuse",
> >>>>                                      "mediatek,efuse";
> >>>>                         reg = <0 0x08000000 0 0x0010>;
> >>>>                         #address-cells = <1>;
> >>>>                         #size-cells = <1>;
> >>>>                         status = "disabled";
> >>>>                 };
> >>>>
> >>>>                 gic: interrupt-controller@0c000000 {
> >>>>                         compatible = "arm,gic-v3";
> >>>>                         #interrupt-cells = <4>;
> >>>>
> >>>> Best Regards,
> >>>> Erin
> >>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> >>>>> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> >>>> linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-mediatek mailing list
> Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek