Re: [PATCH v2] module: Cure the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity

From: Thomas Gleixner
Date: Sun Feb 10 2019 - 13:58:22 EST


On Sat, 9 Feb 2019, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> > + * Both "GPL v2" and "GPL" (the latter also in dual licensed strings) are
> > + * merily stating that the module is licensed under the GPL v2, but are not
>
> Nit: did you mean merely (as mere/just) ? or merily/merrily (as in
> cheerfully/happily) ? :D

Bah. merely of course.

Jon, want me to resend?

Thanks,

tglx