Re: [PATCH v2] module: Cure the MODULE_LICENSE "GPL" vs. "GPL v2" bogosity
From: Jonathan Corbet
Date: Mon Feb 11 2019 - 10:19:20 EST
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 19:58:11 +0100 (CET)
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Feb 2019, Philippe Ombredanne wrote:
> > > + * Both "GPL v2" and "GPL" (the latter also in dual licensed strings) are
> > > + * merily stating that the module is licensed under the GPL v2, but are not
> > Nit: did you mean merely (as mere/just) ? or merily/merrily (as in
> > cheerfully/happily) ? :D
> Bah. merely of course.
> Jon, want me to resend?
Nah...I merily made the tweak while adding Jessica's ack.