Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] ICL support and other enhancements for PMC Core

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 8:13 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 8:02 PM Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
> <rajneesh.bhardwaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On 13-Feb-19 10:58 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 13, 2019 at 5:50 PM Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
> > > <rajneesh.bhardwaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> On 13-Feb-19 9:03 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > > We don't do rebasing for published changes. Only in rear cases when
> > > otherwise would be worse.
> > > Darren didn't respond to my question what he thinks about this case,
> > > but at least it's not related to the code itself which, in my opinion,
> > > decreases a severity.
> >
> > Thanks Andy. So if i understand correctly, you are suggesting that i
> > should ignore those patches that made to "for-next" branch already?
>
> I suggest you to rebase your local branch against latest subsystem tip
> branch, resolve conflicts if any, test, and only after that send a new
> version.

To clarify: "subsystem tip branch" in our case means for-next. The
above is a generic process which would work with Linux kernel
development.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko