Re: [RESEND PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: atmel: add new sam9x60 SFR binding

[Nicolas.Ferre]

On 06/02/2019 at 19:04, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Add this SFR compatible definition for the sam9x60 SoC. Will be needed
> in OHCI driver: ohci-at91.c.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Hi Rob,
> It seems that this patch was lost in my series "[PATCH 0/8] ARM: at91/dt:
> update to existing drivers for the sam9x60 SoC". I split it and resend it only
> for USB tree.

Rob,

Ping...


> Hi Greg,
> 
> This DT bindind goes with the patch already queued in your usb-next tree "USB:
> host: ohci-at91: add sam9x60-sfr definition for ohci".
> 
> Once Rob added his tag, can you please queue it in your tree as I reviewed my
> first idea of adding it to the arm-soc tree?
> 
> Best regards,
>    Nicolas
> 
>   Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
> index badce6ef3ab3..dfc91bc02b97 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/atmel-sysregs.txt
> @@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ required properties:
>   - compatible: Should be "atmel,<chip>-sfr", "syscon" or
>   	"atmel,<chip>-sfrbu", "syscon"
>     <chip> can be "sama5d3", "sama5d4" or "sama5d2".
> +  It also can be "microchip,sam9x60-sfr", "syscon".
>   - reg: Should contain registers location and length
>   
>   	sfr@f0038000 {
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre