Re: [RFC v10 0/4] pstore/block: new support logger for block devices

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 02:33:41PM +0800, liaoweixiong wrote:
> Why should we need pstore_block?
> 1. Most embedded intelligent equipment have no persistent ram, which
> increases costs. We perfer to cheaper solutions, like block devices.
> In fast, there is already a sample for block device logger in driver
> MTD (drivers/mtd/mtdoops.c).
> 2. Do not any equipment have battery, which means that it lost all data
> on general ram if power failure. Pstore has little to do for these
> equipments.
> 
> [PATCH v10]

Why are you still labeling these as "RFC"?  No one should actually be
applying a Request For Comments patchset, as you obviously are not
thinking it is ready to be merged :(

After 10 revisions, I hope you are confident in this patchset :)

thanks,

greg k-h